Search This Blog

22 February, 2011

Why Our Graveyards are Not Spacious

In 1985-86 I happened to be in England. Being a student of English literature I knew a few things about English culture and society. But when in England I really discovered my poor and pathetic knowledge of the country and its way of life. In fact, I did not even know that every city in that country had registered companies for burying the dead. I was told, then, that these were the requirements of the modern age. Who had time to bury his father or mother? The city of Leicester, where I had my temporary residence, had a Rose Funeral Ltd which served the clients who had no time for burying their loved ones. It would obtain a priest to perform the last rituals, buy coffin and do other needful to bury the dead honourably. It would even place fresh flowers on the grave every day if the client so desired. Finally he would send the bill to his client who will pay it without questioning and appreciate the services which he had neither bothered to perform nor to see. This was probably my first encounter with the mechanized life of the modern world.

There were more things to happen. One day a nice-looking and well-mannered man came to us and wanted to take us to the graveyard. He was employed with Leicester University and a Muslim colleague had expired whom he wanted to bury. The departed soul was from India’s Dehradun and was dead against the idea of Partition and Pakistan. He never interacted with the Muslims of the city thinking they all were Pakistanis which, in fact, was untrue. He was alone at home, his wife had gone to London accompanying his elder brother who had come from Pakistan and thus there was no one to look after him when he was breathing his last. He had a stroke, and despite being in immense pain, could manage to call the doctor. He was rushed to hospital where he died soon after.

No one knew him except Mr Abdur Rashid Siddiqi, the nice-looking, ever smiling handsome gentleman I have mentioned above. Barely he could manage some two dozen people who offered Salat-e-Janaja and buried him in his new abode, just a yard wide and six fit long.

We Indians die with some ‘fanfare’ by which I mean the religio-cultural rituals which are normally performed by sufficient numbers of people who make a reasonable crowd. I remembered the death and burial of some relatives/ acquaintances whose last rites were performed with the respect they had never commanded when alive. That moment I prayed in my heart not to die in England and a few months later I indeed returned to India.

But what I could not foresee was the fact that modernity was fast spreading in India as well. Our mega cities have especially become the islands where the modern world lives with all its fatal diseases. In England the graveyards, at least, were neat and clean but here in India most of them are in bad condition. The relatively small England has more space for its dead but a far more bigger India, especially in Delhi, seems to be quite miserly in this regard.

Recently a dear one breathed his last in Delhi. A man of knowledge with great literary sensibilities he has been buried in the graveyard located behind the Times of India building. While standing beside his very narrowly-dug grave I began to recount all that I have written above. Here, too, there were not enough people in the graveyard, though a large number had offered the Salat-e-Janaja in the mosque. Has modernity reached our doorsteps as well, I asked myself? I immediately answered in negative. Surely, some bad aspects of modernity have creeped into our lives but we are still the famous – not notorious – emotional Indians. At least I was there to recollect my childhood memories, remembering how hard he had struggled to study in adverse circumstances. He was our Badar Bhai, many years senior in age who would occasionally play with us, a poor player indeed he was. We would run fast and climb trees even faster which he would try and fail invariably. But he never got frustrated; he would crack jokes, laugh and make us laugh.

I recollect another thing from our childhood days. He had a photo, in black and white, but in a good frame.

The photo showed him as a weak, poor labourer with a bagful of load on his back. Beneath the photo he had got inscribed the following couplet:

Hai Shabab Apne Lahoo Ki Aag mein Jalne ka Nam

Sakht Koshi se Hai Talkhe Zindagani Angbeen.

A literal translation: “Youth is to burn oneself in one’s own blood/hard work makes even a sour life as sweet as grapes” would not do justice. The deeper meaning is that you need to put in hard work to enjoy and relish the sweet fruits of life. Badar Bhai practiced this philosophy all his life.

Despite being born and brought up in a village, where the atmosphere was not quite congenial to studies, he would read books for hours—books which became his life-long passion. He studied at Shibli College, Azamgarh, then joined AMU, Aligarh for postgraduation and finally became an IAS officer. Officers in our country are known to be quite rich but could never learn the art of becoming rich. He indeed remained a “rich poor” and could not manage to buy even a flat in Delhi with his salary. He was compelled to sell the land he had inherited from his ancestors for owning an abode in Delhi which, I am not sure, if he had managed to buy. Our media highlights the misdeeds of corrupt officers, but have no space to appreciate the honesty of officials like our late Badar Bhai.

References made to modernity should not mislead anyone. I detest the aspect of modernity that converts man into a soulless machine; the modernity that seeks the development and progress of man is my passion. Our civilization must grow but it must also maintain a balance between material and spiritual spheres. This balance is missing from life in mega cities.

As a result of the missing balance between spirituality and materialism people make big houses in this ephemeral world and forget to make even a small hut in the world hereafter. Tolstoy ends one of his beautiful stories that his protagonist – a greedy man– could get only two yard land as do all other men after they die. Our last Mughal King, Bahadur Shah Zafar has beautifully said:

Hai Kitna Badnaseeb Zafar Dafn Ke Liye

Do Gaz Zameen Bhi Na Mily kuy-e-yar mein

Zafar is unfortunate to have not even Two yards land in the alley of the beloved where he would be buried honourably.

Delhi has really become a cruel city where the dead do not get even two yards land. In our village our Badar Bhai would have got enough space; here in Delhi he could get even less than two yards. Why the Muslims cannot have spacious graveyards in Delhi, why their permanent resting place should be very crowded? We must ask ourselves or the government must answer it. Perhaps ultimately it is the Muslim community which has to do something for having cleaner and spacious graveyards.

I have heard some senior citizens narrating an anecdote. Once Maulana Azad, the first education Minister of India, complained to Nehru that the DDA was grabbing Muslim graveyards to develop our grand capital. Nehru’s reply was that large chunks of Delhi’s land were graveyards which were not in use. He gave the verdict that the portions of graveyards having no graves may be acquired by the DDA. Now the Muslim population in Delhi has increased many fold and the existing graveyards cannot provide ‘honourable’ space to all their dead. Can the DDA now pay back by allotting some land to the Muslims so that he honest people like Badar Bhai can get a spacious grave atleast.

[December, 2010]

A Minister is Not Expected to be Helpless

In an interview to a national daily Mr Salman Khursheed, Minister of Minority Affairs, has frankly accepted that his ministry is toothless and that his job was just to write letters to various ministeries requesting them to implement the minority-related schemes. The very idea of a ministry created specifically for looking after the interests and affairs of the country’s minorities was unappealing to Mr Khursheed in the beginning but having been in the saddle for a while he seems to be convinced of its utility as it highlights and focuses on issues facing the minority communities. He wants a debate on the subject.

There is no denying the fact that the Ministry of Minority Affairs (MMA) is toothless and has, by and large, failed to achieve the goals for which it was created. Several reasons can be ascribed to why the ministry has failed to deliver.

The first and foremost reason is that, unlike other ministries, the MMA does not have its own bureaucratic mechanism and structure in the states. The officers at the district level have specially not been constitutionally obliged to implement the minority-related schemes. As a result the ministry’s funds disbursed to states largely remain unutilized and are returned to the centre towards the end of every fiscal year.

Having said that, let us also admit that the Minister and his officers have also failed in applying their minds creatively. The ministry has never tried to make a frank assessment of its weaknesses with a view to removing them so that it may work effectively for the welfare of the minorities. They know, and tell us frankly, that they are powerless. Would they tell us if they have ever applied their mind to acquire the power necessary for performing their official duty. Have they ever taken up the matter with the Prime Minister or raised it in cabinet meetings seeking cooperation from fellow ministers? Is it not true that the other ministry that the minister holds consumes most of his time and therefore he finds little time to spend in the Ministry of Minority Affairs the idea of which has never enthused him.

Not just the minister, the UPA government also does not seem to be serious about the minority communities. During its first tenure the UPA government had a full-fledged minister to look after the MMA. Today there is just a Minister of State who also heads the ministry dealing with corporate affairs in which he seems to be more interested. It is, therefore, not surprising that the MMA has failed, almost miserably.

It is true that most state governments are not implementing the MMA’s schemes with the seriousness they deserve. However, what worries the most is the fact that the MMA has not tried to be creative in its approach and methodology. The ministry must explain why has it not tried to develop its own mechanism, specially when the related ministries are not cooperating with it. Was it not possible for it to launch centralized schemes under its own umbrella. Was it necessary, for example, to entrust UGC to hold tests for various scholarships it has launched? Was it legally not possible to hold the tests in collaboration with some universities like the AMU, DU or JMI? Even now they can explore the possibilities of such a venture as it would give it a better control over its matters and enable them to distribute the fellowships in a centralized manner from its premises in Delhi.

The ministry could have done well by creating a central body with the specific purpose of opening schools in minority-dominated districts. Why is it necessary that a school can be opened only by the HRD ministry and by the bodies it has constituted/created?

At least the MMA could have got it approved by the cabinet that related ministries would create a special bureau within their overall network and structure with a view to implementing its schemes. That they receive from time to time. This surely would have solved the problems that the MMA faces today.

Too much time has already been wasted. Mr Khursheed must realize that the public would not be forgiving if he fails to deliver which he is officially obliged to do. He is a minister not to express helplessness; he must acquire the power necessary to fulfil his duties.

What he should realize the most is the fact that the failure of the MMA would have a devastating effect on the minorities, especially the Muslims. Although the MMA has been created to improve the conditions of all minorities including the Hindus in Jammu & Kashmir and some North-Eastern states. About 30 of the 90 minority-dominated districts are the ones in which the Hindus and other communities outnumber the Muslim minority. But some how the impression has been created that in India the term minority means the Muslims. A lot many Muslims, too, have the wrong impression that the MMA has been created to look after the Muslim interests. It is possible, therefore, that the MMA’s failure would demoralize the already marginalized Muslim community in India.

It is not just an apprehension. This writer has met many Muslim research scholars who have qualified the UGC-conducted test and won the scholarships launched by the MMA first appeared in the list of successful candidates. But they are still waiting to receive the first installment of their scholarships. This is very frustrating and many have started asking that who else would help them if not the MMA. Therefore Mr Khursheed’s expression of helplessness is very disturbing to say the least. Our Muslim youth may start thinking that there is no one around who can help them. He must realize that emergence of such a trend among the Muslims would be very dangerous both for the Muslim community as well as the country. We expect Mr Khursheed to act and not to express helplessness.
[November, 2010]